Dear Virginia,
Your counseling friends are right. All
of you were affected--probably unintentionally--when the Washington State legislature passed a bill (2SHB 2674) eliminating
the registered counselor (RC) credential and establishing several new credentials in its place. The lower levels (in
terms of qualifications) include two new categories--certified advisors and certified counselors--who
are permitted to do private practice counseling within carefully defined and prescribed limits.
However, when a term is used
in legislation, it is usually defined. So the new law includes a
definition of "private practice counseling." For years, private
practice counseling has been a common term meaning when a counselor
has a business providing mental health services to clients for a fee. But under the new
legal definition effective July 1, 2009, "Private practice
counseling means the practice of counseling by a certified
counselor or certified adviser as specified in RCW 18.19.200."
So yes, Virginia, as I read the
legislation, since you are NOT a
certified counselor or certified adviser, you will NOT be able to
refer to what you do as private practice counseling. Nor will your 4,615
fellow Licensed Mental Health Counselors, 1,060 Licensed
Marriage and Family Therapists, and 3,209 Licensed Social Work
Counselors in the State of Washington.
Oh, you will still be able to have a
counseling business; you will still be able to help troubled
clients; and you will still be able to charge for your services. You
just won’t be able to say, “I do private practice counseling.” In
fact, you may not be able to say that you are a counselor and that
you have your own private practice. (Consult an attorney.
Otherwise you may accidentally break the law when trying to describe
the kind of work you do.)
But private practice
counseling will continue, Virginia. It will exist as certainly as love
and generosity and devotion exist, and you know that they abound and
give life its highest beauty and joy. But alas! Private
practice counseling’s most highly trained and most experienced
counselors will no longer be able to use those words to offer that
service to clients in need.
You and your fellow professional
counselors will need to develop a new vocabulary. Or,
alternatively you and your colleagues could ask your representatives
in the Washington State legislature to amend the law so all of you
could keep using the old familiar term the way you used to.
Best wishes,
Floyd Else, MA, LMHC, NCC
Webmaster: http://www.CounselingSeattle.com
CounselingSeattle LLC, PO Box 6714, Bellevue, WA 98008-0714
more
References:
1. 2SHB 2674:
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2007-08/Pdf/Bills/House%20Passed%20Legislature/2674-S2.PL.pdf
2. See:
RCW 18.19.020, Definitions. (Effective July 1, 2009.) Paragraph (10).
3. Numbers of licensed counselors in each category were provided November 5,
2008, by the Health Department, Health Systems Quality Assurance, Public Disclosure
Record Center in Olympia.
Email about "Private Practice Counseling" Issue
TO:
Betty Moe, DOH WA GOV
Date: December 30, 2008
Subject: Error in the meeting notes for December 12, 2008
Dear Betty J. Moe, DOH
Program Manager
You know I drove down to
Kent DSHS the morning of December 12, 2008, signed in a received a
visitors badge, attended the full meeting of the Licensed
Mental Health Counselors, Marriage & Family Therapists and Social
Workers Advisory Committee.
I passed out to all in
attendance (including yourself) materials dealing with my concern
that the new counselors law had mistakenly restricted the use of the
phrase, "private practice counseling" to the new counseling
categories of "certified counselor" and "certified advisor." [Please
see to paragraph 10 of the definitions in the
counseling regulation RCW 18.19.020 Definitions. (Effective July 1,
2009.).]
There was an open
discussion of my concerns and Bob Nicoloff (executive director of
the state Department of Health’s Division for Mental Health
Professions) referred the matter to Assistant Attorney General,
Heather A. Carter, to determine whether the legislation had created
a protected class in terms of the term "private practice
counseling." My actual concern, however, is whether this
unfortunate definition serves any purpose in restricting the scope
of practice for Certified Advisors and Certified Counselors. I
believe that other sections of the law clearly state the
restrictions on these two classes of counselors and that the legal
definition of private practice counseling should be
changed to reflect its real, common law definition.
The search engine
www.Google.com cannot find a
definition of "private practice counseling" and I fear that the new
legal definition may become the only definition available. I
would recommend the Washington legislature be asked to amend the
definition to read: "Private practice counseling is the practice
of the profession of counseling as an independent business and not
as an employee."
Imagine my surprise,
when I received your email containing the minutes of the December
12th meeting. I discovered that I was not listed as having
attended the meeting, there was no mention of the "private practice
counseling" issue, the discussion that accompanied my handout was
not mentioned, and there is no mention of referral to the AAG for
findings and recommendations.
May I inquire how it
happened that I and my concerns were omitted from the minutes, and
may I request that the minutes of the meeting be amended to include
my presence and my issues?
Sincerely,
Floyd Else, Webmaster:
www.CounselingSeattle.com
CounselingSeattle LLC
P. O. Box 6714 Bellevue, WA. 98008-0714
Return to Counselor Questions page.
Return to consumer questions page.